India has prolonged its anti-spam regime to require caller-ID and call-management apps to share customers’ spam experiences with telecom operators, prompting spam-blocking app maker Truecaller to name the ruling anti-competitive.
On Friday, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), the nation’s telecom regulator, amended guidelines governing industrial communications, making it necessary for caller-ID and call-management apps that allow customers flag calls as spam or junk to ship these experiences to a blockchain-based platform maintained by telecom operators. The platform tracks industrial communications and enforces anti-spam guidelines.
The change, TRAI mentioned, is meant to broaden the pool of spam experiences accessible for motion towards spammers, successfully connecting experiences collected by apps with the telecom business’s enforcement infrastructure.
Nevertheless, Truecaller informed TechCrunch that it sees this requirement as a “one-way alternate” that’s “anti-competitive,” arguing that it transfers commercially invaluable knowledge from call-management apps like itself to telecom operators.
India is Truecaller’s largest market, accounting for properly over 350 million of its greater than 500 million month-to-month energetic customers globally. The Stockholm-based firm makes use of neighborhood experiences alongside automated detection and different alerts to establish and block spam calls.
The principles come as India grapples with spam and fraudulent calls at monumental scale. In its report in February, Truecaller mentioned its customers within the nation encountered round 42 billion spam calls in 2025, together with calls that have been blocked, labeled, or ignored. The corporate additionally acknowledged that it blocked practically 12 billion spam calls throughout the yr.
It isn’t the primary time Truecaller and the Indian regulator have been at odds over how spam calls needs to be dealt with. The Swedish firm beforehand objected to restrictions stopping call-management apps from robotically labeling calls from sure government-designated quantity ranges as spam. It argued that the exemption might enable undesirable calls to flee its filters.
Nevertheless, Friday’s amendments retain that restriction and have barred call-management apps from blanket blocking, filtering, or spam-tagging calls from designated quantity collection used for promotional, service, and transactional communications. Particular person customers can nonetheless select to dam such calls on their very own units, the regulator mentioned.
“Whereas our knowledge and person sentiment clearly present that spam has skyrocketed as a consequence of this free cross to spammers, now we have been compliant with this since late final yr,” a Truecaller spokesperson mentioned.
Sumeysh Srivastava, a accomplice at New Delhi-based consulting agency The Quantum Hub, who leads its telecom-regulation coverage work, mentioned the newest change bridges two distinct layers: Telecom operators present the underlying community and run the blockchain-based anti-spam system, whereas caller-ID apps function on high of the community to establish and filter calls.
That raises technical and jurisdictional questions, Srivastava informed TechCrunch, together with what reporting requirements apps must observe and the way the requirement will likely be enforced towards corporations that aren’t themselves telecom operators.
A March draft proposed (PDF) utilizing India’s IT legal guidelines to implement the requirement. Nevertheless, Srivastava identified that the brand new announcement didn’t say whether or not that enforcement mechanism was retained within the last guidelines.
Additionally it is unclear how a lot info the apps will even have to supply beneath the up to date regulation. Kazim Rizvi, founding director of New Delhi-based coverage suppose tank The Dialogue, informed TechCrunch that requiring an app to transmit a selected spam report made by a person is materially completely different from requiring it to share the broader datasets, status alerts, or analytical programs it makes use of to establish suspicious calls.
The principles will want readability on what info have to be transmitted, how customers are notified or requested for consent, and the way that knowledge can subsequently be retained and used, Rizvi mentioned.
TRAI didn’t reply to TechCrunch’s questions on what info apps could be required to share and whether or not the rule would additionally apply to spam-reporting options constructed into smartphone working programs and dialers corresponding to Android and iOS.
New guidelines for AI-powered calls
The amendments additionally deal with the rising use of software program and AI voice brokers to make calls. Calls made robotically, with no particular person straight dialing the quantity, will now fall beneath TRAI’s application-to-person (A2P) framework. That features robocalls and calls utilizing prerecorded or synthetic voices.
Firms utilizing such programs must declare their use and the cellphone numbers concerned to their telecom operators prematurely. Undeclared A2P calls will likely be handled as spam, TRAI mentioned.
The important thing take a look at, Srivastava mentioned, is how a name is initiated, moderately than merely whether or not it makes use of an AI-generated voice, leaving some uncertainty round AI-assisted calls that contain human initiation.
Satya N. Gupta, a former further secretary at TRAI, informed TechCrunch that the brand new guidelines don’t limit companies from utilizing AI or different automated calling applied sciences, however as a substitute require them to reveal their use to telecom operators.
Telecom operators may also be allowed to levy a termination cost of as much as 5 paise (about 0.052 cents) per minute on A2P calls. Nevertheless, calls made utilizing sure designated quantity ranges will likely be exempt.
Rizvi informed TechCrunch that the brand new definition might additionally cowl calls made utilizing software program even when an individual continues to be concerned, corresponding to calls from contact facilities and click-to-call companies. “With out that distinction, the A2P class dangers changing into broader than the regulatory hurt it’s supposed to deal with,” he mentioned.
Once you buy by means of hyperlinks in our articles, we could earn a small fee. This doesn’t have an effect on our editorial independence.
